Everything you need to know about the horrific Wagatha Christie trial

Everything you need to know about the horrific Wagatha Christie trial ...

The Brits live for two things: football (soccer, stateside) and tea; in the $3.7 million Wagatha Christie trial, there is a lot of hot tea being spilled.

The horrific incident, in which every tasty morsel has been ravaged in the United Kingdom, centers around two of the world''s most famous WAGs, namely the glamorous wives and girlfriends of legendary athletes Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy. The sexy soccer spouses are embroiled in a vile doppelganger.

Heres whos facing off: Rooney, 36, who is married to Wayne Rooney, a former Manchester United forward, and manager of Derby Football Club; and Vardy, 40, the wife of Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy. They are extremely wealthy and very difficult to understand.

Raging Rooney has accused Vardy, in the most public of ways, of lying about her to The Sun newspaper, and Vardy is suing Rooney for libel in response.

Wagatha Christie, a dogfighter in the United Kingdom, has been dubbed by the salivating British press because, in true Miss Marple fashion, Rooney solved her own mystery dramatically and revealed the shocking discovery in a parlor-scene-like Twitter post.

Since then, it has been a chain of women.

This trial has everything: gossip about a D-list celebrity''s manhood, tears in open court, shoulder pads, Chanel and Prada''s appearances, and a whole bunch of bronzer and diamonds bigger than your knuckles. These two make Krystal and Alexis Dynasty swimming pool brawls look like a relaxing bubble bath.

The women''s battle began with a reported months-long betrayal on Instagram.

In 2017, The Sun began distributing private stories about Rooneys life, which only her close friends would disclose.

The wealthy soccer wife started a sting operation in 2019 as a fundraiser.

Rooney interdits all her followers on Instagram over five months, except for one account Vardys.

Crafty Rooney said she published a series of false statements to see if they made their way into the newspaper. And, lo and behold, they did. A rumored appearance on Strictly Come Dancing (The Stars British version) and her flooded house have surfaced.

Another Sun article claims she had traveled to Mexico for gender selection treatment to ensure her fifth child was a girl in August 2019.

The WAG all provided a bunker.

And she wasn''t done yet.

Rooney said he''d have heard from a witness stand this week that my private Instagram account was capable. The fact that The Sun reported all of this information that had happened and was untrue gave me the rage to reveal to the public that someone was providing my private information. I was irritated. I was fazed.

In October 2019 and, like a mustachioed Hercule Poirot, Rooney admitted to Twitter profoundly revealing her findings.

This has been a painful year in my life for a few years now, and finally I have recovered from the damage, according to her.

I''ve had a tough time keeping it to myself and not making any personal comments, especially when the stories have been leaked, however I had to. I now know for sure which account / individual its coming from.

All of the original stories that show just one person has seen them have been saved and taken into account.

Account of the.Rebekah Vardys.

The claim on the internet exploded, and Wagatha Christie was born.

In July 2020, Vardy, a mother of five, filed a libel lawsuit against Rooney, alleging that the abuse caused extreme distress, hurt, fear, and embarrassment. Vardy alleges wrongdoing.

In a preliminary hearing in November 2020, the judge concluded that Rooney''s Twitter confession alleging Rebekah Vardy was a direct offense against Vardy.

Rooney said she tried three times to resolve the case in order to prevent an ongoing spectacle. Vardy did not bite.

She said she feels bullied and manipulated and continued with the libel action to clear my name, not just for me, for my family and my children.

Rooney may be required to prove that he was specifically Vardy who leaked the stories or to convince the judge, Justice Karen Steyn, that her revelation was in the public interest. It may be complicated, because Vardy insists that other people have accessed her Instagram account over the years. One of these yet unknown individuals could have been Deepthroat.

This week, however, weve learned that Vardy is known to have a history of blabbing to the press, and that Rooneys'' lawyers have tried to portray her as a serial leaker.

WAG, who is defying claims that she sought to make public a narrative about her husbands and former Leicester teammate Danny Drinkwater being detained for drunk driving in 2019, but concluded that the event was a one-off.

Vardy informed her manager to use her personal Instagram account to monitor Rooneys account, according to the court.

Vardy was also quizzed about an interview she had given to the now-defunct News of the World newspaper, which she named Peter Andres penis a chipolata (a tiny sausage) following a night of passion in 2001.

She called the below-the-belt interview one of my greatest regrets.

Vardy would transmit the stories to Caroline Watt, who then allegedly sold them to The Sun. However, water was thrown on the accusedation in court. Watts'' cell phone allegedly contained sufficient evidence and messages, which reportedly fell into the North Sea.

While on a boat trip in Scotland, Watt allegedly dropped her phone, leaving her with no access to the coastline.

Il apologise for the fact that messages between journalists who allegedly disclosed words to Mrs. Watt were lying at the bottom of the sea in a Davy Jones locker.

Vardy, despite being the sharpest coral on the reef, slammed the courtroom with her decision: Who is Davy Jones?

The patient complained that the reference was a speech measure that just indicates the bottom of the sea.

The Rooneys team isn''t buying the oceanic plunge line. Her lawyer claims that Vardy and her defense had made a deliberate and deliberate effort to dispose of evidence. However, Vardy''s lawyers said that although there is no such campaign of deletion the reason there is no direct evidence against Mrs Vardy is because she did not do it.

Watt, the agent, has been deemed inadequate enough to provide evidence.

Vardy has broken down four times on the stand. She began sobbing when she received her fourth baby, barely two months after her post with Rooneys Wagatha, and said she would lose the child.The verdict will be released shortly.

The tensions will continue until the end of the day.

You may also like: