Ritalin's Winning Attention is Enhanced by Revealing

Ritalin's Winning Attention is Enhanced by Revealing ...

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh are able to find out more about Ritalin''s ability to affect brain activity, while demonstrating that different sections of brain cells are regulating attention.

Many more adults, an estimated one in five, use the drugs off-label. While the safety and effectiveness of these drugs is well understood, there is still a lot to learn about them.

According to a senior research author, she studied what these drugs do to the activity of groups of neurons. However, basic scientists like us have been researching what groups of neurons can tell us about behavior and cognition, and thus understanding what these drugs do to groups of neurons can perhaps give us indications about other things they would be beneficial for.

Amy Nish, a Pitt postdoctoral researcher, discussed how well animals performed on a visual task and how likely they are to fire off independently of one another rather than being synched up.

In the present study, scientists discovered that animals that had taken methylphenidate performed better on a visual task of attention, and that the improvement occurred exactly when that same metric of neuron activity shifted. On April 25, the researchers conducted a research in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Some of the study findings were taken from whats already known about the drug. Three animals took methylphenidate or a placebo on alternating days for two weeks of testing. On days when they took the drug, they spent longer on the task and performed better at it, but only when the required task occurred in a spot they were already paying attention.

Very small groups of neurons with electricity or light are targeted by scientists in most neuroscience experiments. Cohen said that we certainly didnt use these drugs, mixed them in fruit juice, and gave them to animals. It surprised me that a very general manipulation might have a very specific behavioral effect.

Such experiments enable researchers to gain a deeper understanding of how neurons function when the brain is in different states such as when a subject has taken a medication versus when they havent, thus allowing researchers to create more complete and useful models of brain cells and behavior.

Cohen said the approach is a mistake, partly because of a lack of approaches to research on how drugs affect the activity of neurons. This makes it difficult to find crossover therapies, i.e., new therapies for pharma that are already on the market.

Recent work in the lab in light of the current study suggests some of these potential crossovers. Ni has discovered similarities between neural patterns linked to attention and certain kinds of learning, implying that treatment for disorders involving one might be beneficial for the other.

Cohen suggests that these stimulants may be beneficial for dealing with a wide spectrum of situations, from cognitive changes associated with normal ageing to Alzheimers disease and others. Though their hunch is currently just a well-informed habit, it is certainly one the research intends to pursue.

For the time being, this study is still a crucial first step in a line of research Cohen wants to explore more closely: connecting the dots between our brains neural patterns and how medications affect it.

It''s one test case, and I believe there''s a lot more to be done, according to she. I hope that people will realize that these approaches are effective.

You may also like: