J&J wants hip implant experts to pay 24,000 dollars in failed whistleblower-related cases

J&J wants hip implant experts to pay 24,000 dollars in failed whistleblower-related cases ...

- Justification for the use of a confidential record in a whistleblower case against the drugmaker: one expert to claim the damages, which has been sought for its hip implants for a period of two months, will pay 2,4 million dollars.

The company in a case in Boston said it was forced to seek compensation for the huge, infringed and unwarranted costs that it suffered due to the aforementioned actions."

It said that the $2.4 million was a fraction of the $7 million in fees and expenses it could seek to recover from Antoni Nargol and David Langton, British orthopedic surgeons who was in mass tort litigation for their Pinnacle hip implants on its own.

The request came after the judgment of the United States' ruling Judge M. Page Kelley on Dec. 8 to ensure they violated the court order by using confidential material, and then turn to the plaintiffs in the larger hip implant dispute.

J&J's DePuy Orthopaedics Inc said Nargol and Langton should be forced to pay its bills, along with an attorney Ross Brooks, of the Brooks Law Company, who was responsible for "multiplicit conduct".

Justin Presnal, who lawyer for the doctors of Simmons Hanly Conroy, and Brooks refused to respond to a comment for comment.

Nargol and Langton sued DePuy in 2012 under the false claims law, which allows whistleblowers to sue the government whose firm claims to extort taxpayer funds based on fraudulent claims.

They claimed that DePuy marketed the defective metal-on-metal, pinnacle-branded hip implant implants to unsuspecting doctors and then sought federal reimbursement for the products. DePuy stopped selling the devices in 2013.

Nargol and Langton served as a jurisprudent witness for hip implant plaintiffs in pursuing thousands of product liability suits. After being hit with several adverse jury verdicts, J&J agreed to settle thousands of claims in 2019, although some others are still pending.

If the Justice Department intervenes in whistleblower cases, it declined to do so in their own hands in 2014. Despite the fact that they had been able to do so, a judge dismissed it but it was still a matter of the ruling.

In her ruling, Kelley said early on, the doctors revealed that materials in the suit were subject to protective orders in the Pinnacle multidistrict litigation and had to be removed.

And further violations of their obligations to keep the material confidential made dismissal "a most appropriate sanction," she said.

The case is in United States ex rel Nargol v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 12-10896.

For the execs, Justin Presnal of Simmons Hanly Conroy.

for J&J: Mark Seltzer of Nixon Peabody.

Read more.

Our standards:

You may also like: