J&J wants hip-implantation experts to pay 2,4 million in a failed whistleblower case

J&J wants hip-implantation experts to pay 2,4 million in a failed whistleblower case ...

- Johnson & Johnson wants two expert witnesses in mass tort lawsuits relating to its hip implants to pay $2.4 million for misusing confidential records in their own failed whistleblower lawsuit against the drug maker.

In a federal court in Boston, the company argued that it was "compelled to seek compensation of a portion of the huge, undisproportionate, and unjustly expensive costs that it has suffered due to the aforementioned conduct."

There were 22.4 million dollars in fees and expenses which it could recover from Antoni Nargol and David Langton, British orthopedic surgeons who worked as a forensic witness in the mass tort litigation for its Pinnacle hip implants.

A ruling was granted on Dec. 8. The plaintiffs rejected an oral treatie against the government, as opposed to an attempt to suppress its own semblance to take care of the ointments.

J&J's DePuy Orthopaedics Inc said Nargol and Langton should be forced to pay their costs together with one of their lawyers, Ross Brooks of The Brooks Law Firm, who was responsible for "multiplicitous conduct".

No comment came from Justin Presnal, a lawyer at Simmons Hanly Conroy and Brooks.

Nargol and Langton filed a lawsuit in 2012 under the False Claims Act, which allowed whistleblowers to sue companies on behalf of the government to recover the money paid out by taxpayers based on fraudulent claims.

They alleged that DePuy marketed defective metal-on-metal pinnacle hip implant devices to unmistakable doctors who then demanded government reimbursement for the products. DePuy stopped selling the devices in 2013.

The trial of the hip-implants plaintiffs, including Nargol and Langton, has a potential resuscitation in thousands of product liability cases. After being hurried against several adverse jury verdicts, J&J agreed to settle thousands of cases in 2019, although the other ones are still pending.

As the Justice Department could intervene in whistleblower cases, despite refusing to do so in the US in 2014, which had the state choose to continue to pursue the problem. A judge dismissed the case and insisted that it was ignored by the judges.

In her ruling, Kelley said early on, the doctors revealed that material in their lawsuit was subject to protective orders in the Pinnacle multidistrict litigation and must be removed.

But further violations of their obligations to keep the material secret make dismissal "the most appropriate sanction," she said.

The case is United States ex-law Nargol v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 12-10896.

For the leaders: Justin Presnal of Simmons Hanly Conroy.

For J&J: Mark Seltzer of Nixon Peabody.

Read more here.

Our standards:

You may also like: