Hot topics | Coronavirus pandemic

Senators of Atlantic City lawmakers approval of a widely debated N.J. tax breaks for Atlantic City casinos is a blow to the sluggishness of the debated N.J. tax breaks

Senators of Atlantic City lawmakers approval of a widely debated N.J. tax breaks for Atlantic City casinos is a blow to the sluggishness of the debated N.J. tax breaks

Both houses of the state Legislature approved a controversial plan to encourage tax breaks during the epidemic, a move that proponents believe is necessary to prevent job losses and opponents lement as a giveaway that will harm taxpayers, on Monday.

The Senate voted 21-15 to approve the legislation, which would alter an existing law that would allow the city's gambling rooms to make payments in lieu of property taxes to the city, Atlantic County, and the local school district, allowing the city to pay tax on property taxes.

The state Legislature voted 462-19 late Tuesday night for the bill to be adopted.

Gov., who has to decide on whether to sign the law, will be conceptually... in the right direction, but he would not comment on specifics.

The original law was enacted in 2016, a time when the industry was reeling from the closure of casinos. It prohibited casinos from paying their taxes, a practice that harms the city government's budget, while providing casinos a clear picture of what they had to pay.

This bill would exclude two of the industry's biggest and fastest-growing revenue streams sports betting and online gaming from calculation of how much the casinos will pay the next five years.

After a boon in sports betting and online gaming revenue, Casino leaders say they want the measure to help recover from the pandemic's damage owing to lag revenues from in-person gambling.

The current state Senate president, D-Gloucester, the principal sponsor of the measure, stated that he could close without the new legislation, which would result in thousands of jobs losses.

Sweeney stated Monday that the business is grounded on what casinos have offered him and from listening to and understanding the industry.

Critics, however, say that these claims are dubious, arguing that money is up in general despite the epidemic, and that the bill will enhance gambling halls on the expense of taxpayers.

Sweeney, according to Sweeney, "has not been as well done by casinos as people say."

This helps tremendously," he admitted to reporters about the issue after the Senate vote at the Statehouse in Trenton. Things are getting worse, not better, unfortunately.

The measure is one of the most closely watched bills he made during the frantic lame-duck voting period prior to the next state legislature's sworn-in Jan. 11. It was one of dozens of bills the Legislature voted on Monday.

Sweeney, a South Jersey lawmaker who has often spearheaded legislation focused on Atlantic City, will leave office at the end of the session after a horrifying situation.

According to a report, casinos payments would be reduced to $55 million next year and between $30 million and $65 million in the following years through 2026, according to the measure.

This follows the development of Atlantic City's casinos, driven by sports betting and online gaming winnings, for $4.3 billion throughout the first 11 months of 2021 by the state division of gaming enforcement. Thats up nearly 63 percent from the same period last year and 34 percent in the first 11 months of 2019.

However, the data also shows that in-person gaming has risen 5.5% since 2019 levels, and casino executives complain that they dont receive all of the revenue from sports betting and online gaming because it must be shared between technology firms and sports book partners.

The Casino Association of New Jersey, the trade association representing Atlantic Citys gambling halls, last week, called on lawmakers to pass the tax relief bill since in-person gambling revenues are "down and not improving."

The group said that the failure of the measure will have a further adverse effect on the land-based casinos, which are still recovering from this unprecedented epidemic.

On the other hand, New Jersey Policy Perspective, a liberal thing group, said the bill will provide at least $145 million in annual tax breaks despite casinos having a banner bounce-back year in 2021 and even though the original law gives casinos special tax treatment.

Once again, the house wins, says Peter Chen, a senior policy analyst for the company. This losing bet for New Jersey deprives the state and its residents of a needy public investments in schools, roads, services, and other construction elements of a strong economy,.

Don Guardian, a former Atlantic City mayor who was elected to the state assembly last month, warned that Atlantic County taxpayers would have to pay more so that the casino industry has a tax break.

The Guardian responded earlier this month that it asked for fairness, "I'm asking for fairness." There are too many unknowns, and what is known is not good."

This is the latest in a string of legislation state officials have enacted over the last five years to protect business and local government in the seaside gambling resort, as well as the state, but despite a number of casino closures in the last decade, the state has continued to continue to operate the resort.

While advocates are angry lawmakers are voting on the tax break bill, they are unsure whether it is a separate measure () to have yet to gain traction after more than a year of lobbying, with some of them calling for the bills to be tied together, thereby the other, if one passes.

Since 2006, smoking in New Jersey restaurants and bars has been barred, but smoking sections in gambling halls have been excluded, according to opponents. This is dangerous to casino workers' health.

Murphy has expressed his intention to join, but the bill has not yet been sent for a vote.

Casino managers believe a permanent ban will negatively affect both the industry and the region and cost the casino a certain fortune.

Sweeney had agreed to release the measure for a vote on Monday, saying that "complicated the decision" because passing a ban could put New Jersey at a competitive disadvantage, and he'd prefer casinos across the United States bar smoking instead.

The Senate president stated, Im all for banning smoking, Ive never smoked a cigarette in my life, and I've got to look at the picture. How much am I willing to lose?

This report was provided by the NJ Advance Media staff writer and the Associated Press.

Please subscribe today to our journalism which requires your support.

Follow him on Twitter at.

You may also like: