Air refueling capabilities in a helicopter endangers a US during major war

Air refueling capabilities in a helicopter endangers a US during major war ...

The new report shows that the United States aerial refueling capability is weak and aging, so the nation is risky for a battle against a major adversary.

In the report, Resilient Aerial Refueling: Safeguarding U.S. Militarys Global Reach, it sounds an alarm bell: the militarys tanker fleet has expanded in size and potential waning ability to help US troops project power around the world.

According to the report released Monday, The American aerial refueling enterprise lost altitude in 2021, said Timothy Walton and Bryan Clark of the institutes Center for Defense Concepts and Technology.

As the neoliberal era of the Cold War, more than thirty years ago, the tankers began to make use of a more efficient space, and more quickly the snobs have managed to respond more quickly and more effectively to the conflict. Nevertheless, while the fleet remained a constant control of all the countries, the report stated, a tanker inventory shrunk from 701 aircraft to 473, whereas the tankers were still without the ability to perform their own specialized tasks,

A defense department has emerged to be incapable of deploying commandable equipment in a single mission to the US as much. During the end of the mission, defense will be able to exploit the strengths of the U.S. aerial refueling architecture and U.S. operational plans more broadly. Nevertheless, United States forces are increasingly incapable of deterring or defeat aggression.

Taking the new KC-46 Pegasus tanker into operation could further complicate the situation, a more diversified fleet that is becoming increasingly geriatric the average tanker is 52 years old, and the declining readiness that could result from an increasingly geriatric fleet of the equivalent and other factors are affected by a delay in bringing it into operation.

The report said that the military needs to build up airfields and transportation supplies, and defenses in the Indo-Pacific region, but that doesn't mean that the Air Force can buy up fewer tanks in order to pay for those improvements. But if it does, this would double the cost of the airfields and mass fuel transportation by 2041, the report said.

According to a report, in a conflict, the tanker fleet could find itself cornered by China in a fight if the air force doesnt expand its refueling posture on the ground, besides distributing its forces and fuel stores, and thus compete in a conflict. In such a conflict, the fleet could find its way to provide a four-power telecommunications facility, as well as political access, Hudson said.

The report added that this would seriously limit the number of ships that can offer support and increase the threat of attack, and place them at a higher risk of attack, it said.

The report said that the defense department needed to improve the structural integrity of the tanker complex by making up the current complexities of todays brittle posture to a more common model with an adapted project from the U.S. Air Force, where an army is a unified team, and with its operational capability, so that the military and civil forces can leverage the same cluster of military and civil airfields on U.S. and allied territories with an agile combat workforce.

Despite further distribution of fueling operations, the military can better protect its fuel stocks and keep an access to - at sea and inshore and -to oil delivery systems that the armed forces could use for heavy hauling fuel in large quantities, report said.

This report says that the U.S. military used civil airfields in Japan and South Korea would complicate Chinese targeting efforts. Some of these airfields could be used for extended operations, it said, and if the other would be used as a small operation site, which would allow tankers to get to run up and take off again then and then come off again.

Nevertheless, the Air Force has to continuously evolve its aerial refueling fleet, Hudson said. Using a new tanker to bridge the gap between the KC-46 and the next generation of aircraft known as the KC-Z, this bridge tanker could either be Boeings KC-46 or a LMXT next-generation tanker called the LMXT, an automated Airbus A330 Multi Role Tanker Transport.

Hudson said that bridge tanker should be capable of extending long-range missions and offload large quantities of fuel, since small tankers don't meet the Air Force's requirements. But as far as it goes, the programs should not sap money either making more tankers for the next generation, not developing the first-generation KC-Z advanced air refueling tanker.

A report found that the Air Force must significantly improve its KC-Z program, as well as improve its development, if a fleet of 18-24 of these aircraft are purchased annually and reduce the overall age of the fleet if the Air Force spends more on procurement and less on operations and support.

A report emphasized that modernizing command, control and communications as in aerial refueling would make operational efficiency and efficiency fewer efficiently and effective.

Stephen Losey is the reporter for Defense. He is already reporting for a military magazine called Defense News. The agent was a reporter for the US Air Force. Before that, he covered United States Air Force forces leadership, military personnel and operations for Air Force Times.

You may also like: